L∞ksNeat
- - Home
  - Dashboard
  - Fitness
  - Reader
  - Recipes
  - Topics
Log In

Email
Password
Remember Me

Help: I Can't Sign In Or I Forgot My Username/password

Connect As:

If you click a social network icon and are not a looksneat user, you will be registered and you agree to looksneat's terms of service and privacy policy. Sign Up
Share Why does Mark Zuckerberg need 2,263% more personal protection than Tim Cook?

Tweet

LooksNeat Topic

#navigation ul li#nav_logo:hover ul#site_nav, #navigation ul li#nav_logo:hover ul.display { display: block; } setTimeout(function() { $(".notification_hide").fadeOut(); }, 5000); x

This site works best with Javascript enabled. Not all features will function without Javascript enabled.

Why does Mark Zuckerberg need 2,263% more personal protection than Tim Cook?

Jan 16 2019 by Fast Company

In 2017 Zuckerberg’s security cost $7.3 million, while Cook’s cost just $310,000, according to filings.

Has Facebook’s mishandling of it users’ personal information made CEO Mark Zuckerberg a marked man? You might think that judging by the copious amounts of cash Facebook spends to protect his personal safety.

Read Full Story

Continue Reading Why does Mark Zuckerberg need 2,263% more personal protection than Tim Cook?